한빛사 논문
Shin, Tae Gun MD; Choi, Jin-Ho MD, PhD; Jo, Ik Joon MD, PhD; Sim, Min Seob MD; Song, Hyoung Gon MD, PhD; Jeong, Yeon Kwon MD, PhD; Song, Yong-Bien MD, PhD; Hahn, Joo-Yong MD, PhD; Choi, Seung Hyuk MD, PhD; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol MD, PhD; Jeon, Eun-Seok MD, PhD; Sung, Kiick MD, PhD; Kim, Wook Sung MD, PhD; Lee, Young Tak MD, PhD
From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (TGS, IJJ, MSS, HGS, YKJ, JHC), Medicine (YBS, JYH, SHC, HCG, ESJ, JHC), and Thoracic Surgery (KS, WSK, YTL), Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
E-mail: Jin-Ho Choi, Ik Joon Jo
Abstract
Objective:
We investigated whether the survival of patients with inhospital cardiac arrest could be extended by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared with those of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Design:
A retrospective, single-center, observational study.
Setting:
A tertiary care university hospital.
Patients:
We retrospectively analyzed a total of 406 adult patients with witnessed inhospital cardiac arrest receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation for >10 mins from January 2003 to June 2009 (85 in the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation group and 321 in the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation group).
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
The primary end point was a survival discharge with minimal neurologic impairment. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics and cardiopulmonary resuscitation variables that could potentially affect prognosis. In the matched population (n = 120), the survival discharge rate with minimal neurologic impairment in the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was significantly higher than that in the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (odds ratio of mortality or significant neurologic deficit, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.68; p = .012). In addition, there was a significant difference in the 6-month survival rates with minimal neurologic impairment (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–0.77; p = .003; p <.001 by stratified log-rank test). In the subgroup based on cardiac origin, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation also showed benefits for survival discharge (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.82; p = .026) and 6-month survival with minimal neurologic impairment (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.97; p = .038; p = .013 by stratified log-rank test).
Conclusions:
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed a survival benefit over conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation for >10 mins after witnessed inhospital arrest, especially in cases with cardiac origins.
논문정보
관련 링크
연구자 키워드
연구자 ID
관련분야 연구자보기
소속기관 논문보기
관련분야 논문보기
해당논문 저자보기